TC_NormReynolds_2017_600x400

Trashing Efforts For a Cleaner, Healthier CVRD

Jul 21, 2021 | Norm Reynolds | 0 comments

Given earlier polling that found enthusiastic support in the affected CVRD areas for a curbside collection of household and yard waste as well as a pick up of recyclable materials(74%) it seems obvious there was an organized effort by a few vested interests to defeat the new collection service by a failed AAP.

The Comox Valley Regional District (CVRD) proposal on rural roadside garbage and recycling collection in Electoral Areas A,B and C has failed the Alternative Approval Process ( meaning 10% of the affected electorate have registered their opposition to the collection service. 

10% ! do not want a service that, in my view, was magnificently put together by Regional District Staff.

10% of the residents in the affected Regional District Areas do not want a curbside waste collection service that, according to the CVRD website, would provide  “a convenient waste management program for residents that supports increased waste diversion, reduced greenhouse gas emissions as well as reductions in the long-term costs of the Comox Valley Waste Management Centre landfill.” For an estimated $250 annual fee with no increase in property tax the RDCV curbside collection would include curbside pick up of household waste, recycling collection as well as unlimited yard waste pickup.

According to provincial legislation a failed Alternative Approval Process(AAP) does not mean the project has failed—it simply means that the proposed expenditure, to be approved, needs to go to a referendum.

For reasons not made clear, the CVRD has chosen not to go to referendum with widely supported waste management improvements that would increase the diversion of recyclables, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve convenience and costs for residents.

Given the outstanding effort to propose a  very carefully thought waste and recycling collection in areas that no longer have unsupervised recycling drop off centres and no yard waste pick up as well as a hit and miss roadside waste collection, the whole faint heartedness in the face of the AAP failure makes one profoundly grateful that Covid immunization did not go to a AAP process where 10% of the population that are antivaxers could scuttle the  vaccination program for all those who do want to see an end to the devastating  virus. 

Given earlier polling that found enthusiastic support in the affected CVRD areas for a curbside collection of household and yard waste as well as a pick up of recyclable materials(74%) it seems obvious there was an organized effort by a few vested interests to defeat the new collection service by a failed AAP.

Our landfill is filling up. The cost and difficulty of finding a new landfill site is a nightmare no taxpayer would want to have to confront. Our roads, streams, woodlands and meadows have become the alternative waste management sites.  Plastic waste recycling, which would have been a primary object of curbside recycling, should not be optional in a world where our land, water ways, oceans have become the alternative waste collection sites.  The estimated $250 annual fee would replace existing costs residents now pay for landfill fees, private garbage collection, costs to take recycling to recycle centres in Courtenay or Comox– or they pay the cost of having their environment/neighbourhoods polluted with waste that does not make it to the landfill or recycling centres. 

The fee for rural roadside collection and recycling would not apply to vacant land or other properties that are not generating uncollected waste.

It is my fervent hope that the RDCV does not dither long in going to a referendum on curbside waste and recycling pickup in Areas A,B and C.  I hope/ trust that the support for this program will, this time, foster a citizens group to promote this important initiative in environmental well being in the CVRD.  Where is Project Watershed when our community desperately needs an activist environmental organization?

Norm Reynolds

Columnist

Does an ever-growing economy sink all ships?

Does an ever-growing economy sink all ships?

This week’s “Conversation” is heavy. It needs—NEEDS! an introduction.

An introduction to the discussion of This Civilization IS FINISHED: Conversations on the end of Empire—and what lies beyond by Rupert Read and Samuel Alexander
You can read the whole argument at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340538684_This_civilization_is_finished_Time_to_build_an_ecological_civilization

Beyond the ALR

Beyond the ALR

You are warmly invited to join in CV Conversations which will be more—conversational; represent a diversity of perspectives on topics of interest to Comox Valley residents. We don’t know how this will turn out—It’s and experiment! We’re going to make up the rules as we go and we thoroughly hope that others will want to join the conversations and contribute new ideas as to how the conversations can evolve.

If you are interested in being part of CV Conversations for one issue or for all posts or have some thoughts on how this conversational blog could be even more relevant/interesting send me a note at nreynolds at shaw.ca. We, the founding members of CV Conversations, see this as a natural progression for a participator centred local community website.

Election Call Blues

Election Call Blues

Given the Conservative record under Harper it is hard not to understand the reluctance of Canadian voters to abandon the Liberals by default thinking—even when they don’t like Liberals.

A  Green/Red/Orange BC

A Green/Red/Orange BC

What I failed to adequately consider is that the Fairy Creek watershed of southern Vancouver Island is part of Tree Farm License 46, a 59,000-hectare timber harvesting tenure within the unceded territory of the Pacheedaht First Nation whose band council wants to proceed with logging the old growth in their territory. If one were to do as I suggest and “meet all demands unquestioning…”one would have to permit whatever logging they wish to do “unquestioningly.”

Gold Sponsors
Upcoming Events

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *