The Trickle-Up Effect

Like some of us, I marvel at the power grassroots movements have to generate a sea-change in how people think and what people believe.

As a child of the sixties, I remember the significant role regular people played, who mobilized at the grassroots, in changing the course of history. Think Canadian efforts in the Peace Movement, the Women’s Movement, and the Environmental Movement.

Some big names and well-known faces are associated with each movement, but, we now think of as movements would have been nothing but blips on the historical screen without the discontent, the righteous indignation and the lay-their-freedom-on-the-line action of the nameless and faceless many.

Grassroots movements are the conscience of the powerful. They ring a bell for those least likely to be heard. They create symbols to be remembered as well as slogans and songs that somehow are passed down from one generation to the next.

Sometimes a grassroots movement may experience several starts and stops before it actually gains the momentum needed to win the day.

That’s the case for BC’s proportional representation movement. Yes, it’s a movement, one which came close in 2005 by gaining 57 percent of the vote which almost reached the requirement that voters approve it by a supermajority of 60 percent. In 2009, the proportional representation movement, with only 39 percent of voter approval, crashed and burned; there’s no other way to describe it.

But, like a phoenix rising from the ashes, proportional representation is now, in 2018, experiencing its third life, much to the consternation of those who oppose it.

But, let’s not worry about the opposition. They’re repeating their same old song and dance, thinking, perhaps, that if their tunes and steps were effective twice before, they’ll be effective in swaying voters again.

The opposition comes at us on several fronts. There’s the Independent Contractors and Businesses Association (ICBA) which has filed a court injunction that questions the legality of the referendum. There’s the BC Liberal Party and its leader, Andrew Wilkinson, whose top priority is the defeat of electoral reform. There’s the pundits and lobbyists, sometimes one and the same person, who treat voters to their tired fear mongering about fringe parties and the rise of racism.

Same old, same old.

They don’t want to debate issues because they know that any debate of the issues readily exposes the positives about proportional representation.

Positives like the number of votes a party gets closely equaling the number of seats it gets in the Legislative Assembly. Like parties collaborating to find a balanced approached to governance that stands the test of time.  Like more diverse representation – women, youth, First Nations – which mirrors the diversity of the BC population.

One of my friends tells me that I’m standing in the middle of an activist whirlwind and that I’m a bit naïve to think that the effort some of us are expending to see electoral reform pass in BC can actually be called a movement.

OK.  Call me a pie-in-the-sky kind of gal. Call me infected by living in the la-la land of the Wet Coast. Call me hopeful. Because hopeful, I am.

When other hopefuls like me work for two hours at one event or another, passing out information and talking to people about proportional representation and people stop and listen, we’re hopeful. When our canvassers talk about the interest people at the door express when they hear that most of their votes will actually count toward electing a candidate that represents them, we’re hopeful. When people sign the pledge sheet to vote for proportional representation and, then, contact us offering to volunteer to spread the word, we are hopeful.

In fact, hope is the driving force of any movement.

The proportional representation movement has momentum. History will remember this movement because it will mark a significant change for the better in our provincial government and in our lives.

This is a movement that is destined to cause a trickle-up effect that shakes the halls of government.

Pat Carl

Fair Vote Comox Valley

Blaney Questions Ongoing Policy On Ferry Vehicle Passengers

Blaney Questions Ongoing Policy On Ferry Vehicle Passengers

North Island-Powell River MP Rachel Blaney has sent yet another letter to federal Minister of Transportation Marc Garneau about Transport Canada’s order prohibiting passengers from remaining in their vehicles during sailings if parked on a closed deck. The letter comes after it was reported that Transport Canada is reviewing over 1000 reports of passengers disobeying the order.

Nōmina Wellness is breaking the Mental Health Mold with Engagement and Expertise

Nōmina Wellness is breaking the Mental Health Mold with Engagement and Expertise

The Comox Valley has changed in many ways. Our local population has significantly grown in size, we’re grateful that our current local government officials continue to bridge old gaps (mind the Puntledge pun), and the need for adapting our housing initiatives is driven home by almost unbelievable stories of professionals sharing basement suites with NIC students while looking for homes. And they are the fortunate ones, as too many Comox Valley residents remain homeless while incredibly engaged and qualified people work full tilt full time to find solutions to our social justice dilemmas. It is our pleasure here at Tidechange.ca to introduce you to Nomina Wellness, the new mental health facility with an inclusive, enganged multi-tiered approach to integrating those on the fringes back into the society they long to be part of.

Only NDP MPs Will Bring In Pharmacare, Housing and Climate Action

Only NDP MPs Will Bring In Pharmacare, Housing and Climate Action

At a town hall meeting in Courtenay on Sunday evening, long-time New Democrat MP Nathan Cullen called on voters to unite around the NDP to stop an Andrew Scheer-led Conservative government – and bring universal pharmacare, affordable housing and a strong climate action plan to Vancouver Island.

“We have powerful and effective MPs in Rachel Blaney and Gord Johns,” said Cullen. “They have proven they can stop Conservatives, and they have proven they get things done for coastal communities.”

Gold Sponsors
Upcoming Events


  1. Megan W Ardyche

    I gather Mr. Lung is opposed to proportional representation. I say “I gather” he is because I can’t really understand the points he’s trying to make. Invoking H.G. Wells and John Stuart Mill doesn’t tell me anything about our political system today. Our values have changed tremendously since first-past-the-post came into use, and even since H.G. Wells and John Stuart Mill opined on whatever Mr. Lung thinks they are so erudite about. I believe that any proportional voting system will give voters more power than our current system, AND that it will give parties less power than they currently have to force their agenda through, when they get 100% of the power with 40% or less of the vote. We can parse details until we are completely frozen in a state of inaction, which is possibly what Mr. Lung would like to see happen. The fact of the matter is too many people are getting too cynical about our political system and we need to bring in a voting system that will give back to people some sense of control over what our governments are doing. Ms. Carl is exactly right – now is the time to be hopeful and to translate that hope into action. As Ms. Carl says, “This is a movement that is destined to cause a trickle-up effect that shakes the halls of government.” We can easily see how the opponents to an improved democracy are bringing out all the scare tactics possible, and Mr. Lung’s post is simply another example of trying to either bore people into not caring or scare people into not voting.

  2. Richard Lung

    No, no, no, no! This third referendum resurrection is not a phoenix but a cuckoo! The miserable devils of the latest me-first BC government would not even let the independent recommendation, of the BC Citizesns Assembly referee, stand without corrupting it with the MMP system, they rejected. They call this three-in-one never-before-tried mostrosity Rural urban PR. And it is still better than MMP itself, which the NDP and Greens have given a free run.
    MMP is the worlds best electoral system — for incumbents. MMP is the worlds worst electoral system for electors — the folks elections are supposed to be for.
    As the Welsh Richard report said of this doubly safe seat system of dual candidature, MMP denied voters the fundamental democratic right to reject candidates. Two Welsh reports recommend that MMP be replaced by STV, the BC CA recommendation.
    John Stuart Mill: Proportional Representation is Personal Representation.
    The Angels Weep: H. G. Wells on Electoral Reform.
    (Richard Lung:)
    Peace-making Power-sharing;
    Scientific Method of Elections.
    Science is Ethics as Electics.
    FAB STV: Four Averages Binomial Single Transferable Vote.
    (in French) Modele Scientifique du Proces Electoral.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.